W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 13240] Consider replacing <time> with <data>

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 08:04:10 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RLsHS-0000tC-Re@jessica.w3.org>

Nicholas Stimpson <nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.
                   |                            |com

--- Comment #68 from Nicholas Stimpson <nicholas.stimpson@ntlworld.com> 2011-11-03 08:04:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #62)
> (In reply to comment #61)
> It states that "This element is intended as a way to encode modern dates and
> times in a machine-readable way" and the first example is precisely about
> "verbose unusable microformat garbage". It sounds like people are using it for
> something else, in which case the spec should be fixed to reflect that if
> <time> is brought back.

I don't see a problem with that spec. The way the element is being actually
used is much more like the examples at the bottom. The examples in the spec
aren't prioritised are they?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 3 November 2011 08:06:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:31:22 UTC