- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:51:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13240
Mark <mark@eventidewebdesign.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mark@eventidewebdesign.com
--- Comment #54 from Mark <mark@eventidewebdesign.com> 2011-11-01 15:51:07 UTC ---
I just heard about this issue upon reading it at .NET magazine
(http://www.netmagazine.com/node/1517).
Frankly, I'm completely shocked that such a discussion would even arise. And
then on top of that seeing that the vast majority of the posts here are
definitely against such a change. Yet Hickson stands his ground despite what
the community is saying. I thought this was essentially a "community" effort,
was it not?
I am a relatively inexperienced developer compared to many of the people who
have posted their views on this issue here, so at least *listen* to what others
here are saying!
I counted at least 23 posts that were overtly for keeping the <time> element
and only 5 that specifically mentioned being for dropping it for the <data>
element (minus Ian's posts).
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 15:51:24 UTC