- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:01:19 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13921 Summary: Hi, Section: Other metadata names We're using meta-tags on a public XHTML 1.1-compliant governmental site to expose site-specific meta-information per page to a search-engine crawler that we're using (a commercial product). We're in the process of moving Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#top OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Specification: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#top Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#top Comment: Hi, Section: Other metadata names We're using meta-tags on a public XHTML 1.1-compliant governmental site to expose site-specific meta-information per page to a search-engine crawler that we're using (a commercial product). We're in the process of moving to HTML5, and these meta-tags causes the site to not validate, even though everything else is pure, simple and semantic. I therefore propose that meta-tag names that are not in the wiki[1] are flagged as warnings instead of errors by conformance checkers, since the current spec probably will slow down the speed of HTML5 adoption for a lot of sites, and it also seems "wrong" to limit the generic usefulness of the meta-tag and also break compatibility with HTML 4.01 for no good reason. best regards Eirik Mikkelsen eim@brreg.no [1] http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/MetaExtensions Posted from: 95.169.47.131 User agent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; U; en) Presto/2.9.168 Version/11.50 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 26 August 2011 15:01:24 UTC