- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 07:19:12 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13348 Stephen von Takach <steve@advancedcontrol.com.au> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Disagree, needsReview Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NEEDSINFO | --- Comment #5 from Stephen von Takach <steve@advancedcontrol.com.au> 2011-08-16 07:19:11 UTC --- What additional information do you need? >From my perspective the iframe sandbox doesn't go far enough if browsers are not ignoring X-Frame-Options on sandboxed content. Browser developers should be confident that click-jacking is preventable when using a sandbox under certain conditions. I believe, in this context, there is enough of a case for extending the functionality of the sandbox attribute. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 16 August 2011 07:19:13 UTC