- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:48:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13145 --- Comment #11 from Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> 2011-08-15 18:48:58 UTC --- The algorithm in comment #0 depends on HTML, specifically <br>. How can it go in DOM if it depends on HTML? Also, if it's specced as in comment #0, it will be useless legacy cruft, so we don't want to expose it on anything other than HTMLElement, since browsers don't support it on Element and there's no reason for them to start. So if it's defined like comment #0, it should be in HTML. I agree that if we want to do a complicated rendering-dependent definition, this should be in the same place as Selection, which should be the editing spec. However, currently we're not doing that no matter what, because we have no one to write the spec text. So if it's going to be specced anywhere right now, it should be in HTML, IMO. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 August 2011 18:49:00 UTC