- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:32:14 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13531
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackalmage@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2011-08-02 21:32:14 UTC ---
I don't understand. Yes, <label for> is useful for some structures that
implicit-<label> is not. It doesn't follow that <label for> should thus be
preferred in all situations. Implicit-<label> is useful and less verbose than
<label for> in the common cases that it's possible in.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 21:32:19 UTC