W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11279] the "assigned access key" section doesn't seem to know if it's a definition or a requirement. Should probably be rephrased to more correctly use RFC2119.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:09:41 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PKwNB-0007JZ-B8@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11279

Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|public-html-a11y@w3.org     |cooper@w3.org

--- Comment #1 from Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> 2010-11-23 17:09:40 UTC ---
Bug triage sub-team doesn't think this is a A11Y TF priority. It's not an HTML
feature, just a spec clarity issue. Our understanding is there is a specific
reason for the phrasing approach, and doesn't need task force involvement.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:09:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:09:46 GMT