W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11279] New: the "assigned access key" section doesn't seem to know if it's a definition or a requirement. Should probably be rephrased to more correctly use RFC2119.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 22:09:45 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11279-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11279

           Summary: the "assigned access key" section doesn't seem to know
                    if it's a definition or a requirement. Should probably
                    be rephrased to more correctly use RFC2119.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#pro
                    cessing-model-3
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/editing.html?style=highlight
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#processing-model-3

Comment:
the "assigned access key" section doesn't seem to know if it's a definition or
a requirement. Should probably be rephrased to more correctly use RFC2119.

Posted from: 216.239.45.4

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:09:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 9 November 2010 22:09:54 GMT