W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11244] Should we say that a <video> element doesn't plan when moved around in a document rather than removed?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 08:07:58 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PFMli-0005Ap-Dg@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11244

Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |philipj@opera.com

--- Comment #1 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2010-11-08 08:07:58 UTC ---
I assume s/plan/pause/. If so, then we pretty much have to change the pausing
to a "queue a task" to pause, additionally checking if it's in the document
when running that task.

I think it might be useful, but it is more work to implement and I haven't
heard anyone actually asking for this, yet.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 November 2010 08:08:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 8 November 2010 08:08:00 GMT