W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11244] New: Should we say that a <video> element doesn't plan when moved around in a document rather than removed?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:47:27 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11244-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11244

           Summary: Should we say that a <video> element doesn't plan when
                    moved around in a document rather than removed?
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
               URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#med
                    ia-playback
        OS/Version: other
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson)
        AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch
        ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org,
                    public-html-wg-issue-tracking@w3.org,
                    public-html@w3.org


Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete.html
Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#media-playback

Comment:
Should we say that a <video> element doesn't plan when moved around in a
document rather than removed?

Posted from: 216.239.45.4 by ian@hixie.ch

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 5 November 2010 22:47:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 5 November 2010 22:47:29 GMT