- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:13:49 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9270 Summary: I think this specification is a big step backwards. I don't know if it technically qualifies as “tag soup”, but it sure feels like it. Semantically, a <dl> makes more sense, and moreover I think the <dialog> element (removed during current ongoing Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: Other URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current- work/#conversations OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: HTML5 spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: contributor@whatwg.org QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#conversations Comment: I think this specification is a big step backwards. I don't know if it technically qualifies as “tag soup”, but it sure feels like it. Semantically, a <dl> makes more sense, and moreover I think the <dialog> element (removed during current ongoing HTML5 work) was an EXCELLENT element that solves a very common use case. If HTML5 attempts to formalize already-common practices on the Web, it should provide a <dialog> element. Marking up a conversation as defined in the specification—at least, the one I’m commenting on right now…I hope the version is preserved—it seems contradictory to resort to a group of mixed generic <p>s, <time>s, and <b>s when the spec has gone out of its way to formalize other widespread conventions like <article>. PLEASE, bring back <dialog>! Posted from: 129.2.139.195 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 15:13:51 UTC