W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9187] Need transparency in issue and bug status in databases & document.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:37:11 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NpUWd-0000bi-VG@wiggum.w3.org>

--- Comment #9 from Larry Masinter <lmm@acm.org>  2010-03-10 22:37:11 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
I'm fine with using this as a means of insuring comments don't get lost, and
I'm sorry if it sounded like I meant otherwise. 

It's easy to get lost in the mechanics (what's the state of the database? Who
is allowed to post what kind of comment where, which decisions were already
decided vs. which things are allowed to still be open) vs. the intent (can
outsiders figure out what went on?), and that can happen with a "decision
policy" document too, and some people seem to get caught up in that.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:37:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:47 UTC