- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:11:09 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187 --- Comment #8 from Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> 2010-03-10 22:11:08 --- > (The notion that we're using the process to discuss the process seems odd -- > reminds me of Reddit's Nommit; is this really appropriate?) Two points. First, I don't see that as particularly odd, given that the W3C process document itself indicates that the process for modifying a Recommendation may be used to modify the Process Document itself: http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/processdoc.html#GAProcess Second, we are using a piece of software which is known to be effective at ensuring that comments don't get lost. I see that as different than "using the process to discuss the process". Should a new draft of the HTML Working Group Decision Policy be produced, I see it as highly likely that we will follow the same process seeking input and accessing consensus before the draft gets put into effect. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 22:11:10 UTC