W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > March 2010

[Bug 9187] Need transparency in issue and bug status in databases & document.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:53:22 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1NpTqE-0002q7-PX@wiggum.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9187





--- Comment #7 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2010-03-10 21:53:22 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Hi Laura,
> > 
> > (In reply to comment #1)
> > > Could the chairs please confirm:
> > > 
> > > * If a change proposal is not completed by its deadline, the issue will be
> > > closed without prejudice and DEFERRED to the NEXT VERSION of HTML.
> > > 
> > > * An issue that is closed without prejudice in this way can only be e-raised
> > > with approval of the HTML Chairs. It is an ENDPOINT for the escalation process.
> > > 
> > > Are these correct?
> > 
> > I believe those statements are nearly direct quotes from the decision policy,
> > and have already been confirmed by the chairs via email. Are you looking for
> > some further clarification in the policy itself?
> 
> That would be very helpful. Some do not yet understand the repercussions of
> missing deadlines and the finality of closing an issue. 
> 
> The chairs have been generous in repeatedly extending deadlines to the point
> were deadlines may not be taken seriously by some.
> 
> Realistic and reasonable deadlines should be mutually agreed upon, set, and
> then actually met not only by individual working group members but by task
> force groups as well. 

Maybe this should be a separate bug. These comments don't seem related to
Larry's suggestions.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:53:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 10 March 2010 21:53:25 GMT