W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2010

[Bug 10032] New: Parts of document read like personal observation.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:11:28 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10032-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Parts of document read like personal observation.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
        AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
        ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com

>>>>> In some
>>>>> respects, implementations and author practices have converged with
>>>>> each other and with specifications and standards, but in other ways,
>>>>> they continue to diverge.
>>>> The above is weak on it's own (it reads like a personal observation).
>>>> Can you expand on it and give concrete examples.
>>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document. It's really just an
>>> introduction, not a definitive reference.
>> As way of introduction, the above assertion basically frames the
>> rationale for the document. Without concrete examples, it just sounds
>> like rhetorical grandstanding.
> It just illustrates things are complex.

It fails to illustrate that: it reads like rhetorical grandstanding. To 
illustrate that things were complex, your would need some concrete 
examples or data.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:11:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:51 UTC