W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2010

[Bug 10032] New: Parts of document read like personal observation.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:11:28 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10032-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10032

           Summary: Parts of document read like personal observation.
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
                    Kesteren)
        AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
        ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com


>>>>> In some
>>>>> respects, implementations and author practices have converged with
>>>>> each other and with specifications and standards, but in other ways,
>>>>> they continue to diverge.
>>>>
>>>> The above is weak on it's own (it reads like a personal observation).
>>>> Can you expand on it and give concrete examples.
>>>
>>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document. It's really just an
>>> introduction, not a definitive reference.
>>
>> As way of introduction, the above assertion basically frames the
>> rationale for the document. Without concrete examples, it just sounds
>> like rhetorical grandstanding.
>
> It just illustrates things are complex.

It fails to illustrate that: it reads like rhetorical grandstanding. To 
illustrate that things were complex, your would need some concrete 
examples or data.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:11:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:11:30 GMT