W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2010

[Bug 10031] New: Does editor get to decide what is relelvant or the Working Group?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:09:32 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-10031-2486@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Does editor get to decide what is relelvant or the
                    Working Group?
           Product: HTML WG
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: HTML5 differences from HTML4 (editor: Anne van
        AssignedTo: annevk@opera.com
        ReportedBy: marcosc@opera.com
         QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, annevk@opera.com

On 6/23/10 10:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:    
>>>>> Some features were introduced in
>>>>> specifications; others were introduced in software releases.
>>>> Like which? and why?
>>> I don't think that's of relevance to this document.
>> If that was not relevant, I would not have asked.
> Nice retort, but you are not to decide what is relevant :-)

Fine, then you leave me no option but to request a working group 
decision on this matter and/or a formal response from the WG chair.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 09:09:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:51 UTC