W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > June 2010

[Bug 9898] The Decision Policy (as applied) is ineffective at getting closure on ISSUEs

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:50:42 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1OOBvu-0002rL-HU@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #14 from Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>  2010-06-14 15:50:41 ---
(In reply to comment #8)

> > (b) They would like to raise a Formal Objection to the decision.
> The Process document says: "When the Chair believes that the Group has duly
> considered the legitimate concerns of dissenters as far as is possible and
> reasonable, the group SHOULD move on."
> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/policies.html#managing-dissent
> After a Decision, the Working Group Decision Policy has already provided due
> consideration. If someone merely upgrades into an FO a previous expression of
> disagreement that the chairs have already considered, I think the FO should
> just be recorded and the group should move on. Otherwise, the procedure would
> be vulnerable to DoS by FO.

I'm not saying that raising a Formal Objection is a valid reason to reopen a
decision. Rather, it is a valid reason for a WG participant to post in response
to a decision.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 14 June 2010 15:50:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:51 UTC