W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > April 2010

[Bug 9474] 'h’ would be better (like XHTML2), so we can deprecate 'h*' in the future without the "group" sounding strange

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:32:59 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1O1x5n-0000PS-U5@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9474





--- Comment #4 from Christoph Pper <bugzilla@crissov.de>  2010-04-14 07:36:55 ---
No, this request was about *renaming* hgroup to h, not *adding* h.

One (at least I) wouldnt nest h1 inside h1:

  <h1><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></h1>

instead of

  <hgroup><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></hgroup>

since we wouldnt need hgroup then at all. The proposed alternative was this:

  <h><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></h>

Unlike h, current hgroup with only text-node children would be awkward,
because it didnt group h*.

  <hgroup>Heading</hgroup>
  <h>Heading</h>

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 07:36:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 14 April 2010 07:36:57 GMT