- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:32:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9474 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Päper <bugzilla@crissov.de> 2010-04-14 07:36:55 --- No, this request was about *renaming* ‘hgroup’ to ‘h’, not *adding* ‘h’. One (at least I) wouldn’t nest ‘h1’ inside ‘h1’: <h1><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></h1> instead of <hgroup><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></hgroup> since we wouldn’t need ‘hgroup’ then at all. The proposed alternative was this: <h><h1>Heading</h1><h2>Subheading</h2></h> Unlike ‘h’, current ‘hgroup‘ with only text-node children would be awkward, because it didn’t “group h*”. <hgroup>Heading</hgroup> <h>Heading</h> -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 14 April 2010 07:36:57 UTC