W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-bugzilla@w3.org > October 2009

[Bug 7843] Please make 'abort', ' loadend' and 'emptied' use "queue a task". Firing them sync is annoying to implement and doesn't seem to solve any problem.

From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:11:38 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1N0Akk-000257-J3@wiggum.w3.org>

Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>  2009-10-20 09:11:38 ---
If we make them async, the state of the element will be at odds with the event.
For example, 'emptied' would fire at a time that doesn't involve the element
being empty. That seems bad, from an API perspective, no?

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:11:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 16:30:41 UTC