- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:03:13 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7806
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #6 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-10-20 09:03:13 ---
> I still do not understand why it says "undereferencable". Is this a normative
> requirement?
Yes.
> If so, for what reason?
Because if you gave a ereferencable URL, people might be tempted to dereference
it, which would be bad, since it wouldn't point at the article in question.
> "The same <span>absolute URL</span> should be
> generated for each run of this algorithm when given the same
> input."
>
> I think this should be a "must".
Certain UAs won't be able to guarantee that, e.g. because they store no state
and thus use a hash of the page and the page changes slightly each time the
page is loaded.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:03:15 UTC