- From: Léonie Watson <LWatson@PacielloGroup.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 09:40:13 -0000
- To: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Sam Ruby wrote: "There clearly are voices for "bleeding edge only". I've heard nobody advocate "stable releases only". I'd describe a position of "regular releases and making the bleeding edge publicly available" as enjoying a comfortable majority." It's a sensible approach. We want to work more efficiently and release more frequently as HTML moves forward, but also need to bear in mind that organisations (the UK Government for example) can't reference the bleeding edge at a policy level. A combination of regular releases and bleeding edge availability should get us closer to where we all want/need to be. Léonie. -- Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup
Received on Monday, 3 November 2014 09:40:35 UTC