W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > July 2014

RE: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:49:28 +0000
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <d493afe2e5a041639cbd84d01888150a@BL2PR03MB418.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> Could you at least publish a stable document before asking the WG to claim that it is stable?  

The CfC does point to a 'stable' document that will be used for the CfC and the transition request to the Director.  See:
http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/

The CfC also give a list of the bugs that were resolved as part of the 'final' Last Call:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=HTML5%20spec&list_id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=LC

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@gbiv.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:44 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: Sam Ruby; public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

On Jul 16, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Paul Cotton wrote:

> We did the "final" Last Call as planned.  We just exited from that Last Call yesterday.

Huh, I completely missed it -- one of the many problems with buying a house, I guess.  It's a pity that the current draft still has normative dependencies to non-standard specs. :(

Could you at least publish a stable document before asking the WG to claim that it is stable?  I mean, publish the results of LC first before making the request for CR.

....Roy
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:50:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:36 UTC