W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > July 2014

RE: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2014 17:35:29 +0000
To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
CC: "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
Message-ID: <17afdd4e4a1a4ee488cca4109fc45a3e@BL2PR03MB418.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
We did the "final" Last Call as planned.  We just exited from that Last Call yesterday.

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Roy T. Fielding [mailto:fielding@gbiv.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 1:21 PM
To: Sam Ruby
Cc: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: Re: CfC: Request transition of HTML5 to Candidate Recommendation

I thought the WG had just made a decision to return the document to an additional last call.  Was that LC made?  Note that the changes haven't even been made it as a WD yet, let alone an LC, so I don't see how that is possible.

....Roy

On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> In accordance with both the W3C process's requirement to record the 
> group's decision to request advancement [1], and with the steps 
> identified in the "Plan 2014" CfC [2], this is a Call for Consensus
> (CfC) to request transition to CR for the following document:
> 
> http://htmlwg.org/heartbeat/CR-html5-20140731/
> 
> For reference, here is a list of bugs addressed during the previous LC for this document:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?component=HTML5%20spec&list
> _id=40771&product=HTML%20WG&query_format=advanced&target_milestone=LC
> 
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive 
> responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Wednesday July 
> 23rd, this resolution will carry.
> 
> Considerations to note:
> 
> - A request to advance indicates that the Working Group believes the 
> specification is stable and appropriate for implementation.
> 
> - The specification MAY still change based on implementation experience.
> 
> - Sam Ruby, on behalf of the W3C co-chairs
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Oct/0026.html
> 
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2014 17:35:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:36 UTC