W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-admin@w3.org > February 2013

Re: EME FPWD CfC is closed

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:23:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+dcGwDTKvoWs-ogqF_MXMp7ZyvVtUpDpzZQVVWjX8aFAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html-admin@w3.org" <public-html-admin@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Fred Andrews <fredandw@live.com> wrote:

> The issue at hand has wider implications than most.  The discussion
> started here, continues here, and is planned to return here.  I would
> ask the Chairs to be tolerant in this special case.
> The W3C are responsible for their own actions.  I really don't care
> what they decide because if they support DRM then they no longer
> matter as the good work will move elsewhere.

You ask the chairs to be tolerant, but then condescend by claiming that if
the W3C "support[s] DRM", then the W3C "no longer matter[s]".

It is statements like this that show how out of touch some individuals are
with respect to both W3C process and industry needs [1]. How can you expect
a rational discussion in this context?

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2013Feb/0153.html

We are extending them the courtesy of helping them understand the issues.

So, your contribution to this thread is merely to help educate the W3C?
Rather patronizing aren't you.
Received on Monday, 11 February 2013 23:24:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:37:33 UTC