W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > September 2012

Re: The latest InstateLongDesc CP effectively contains MUST-level UA conformance criteria

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2012 05:55:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAOavpvdmCVR5FqARfSbj7PQCkegqLxrUfsAHm4GvLf-vOkYRVA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "public-html-a11y@w3.org Task Force" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Hi Maciej,

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> I wanted to point out for the record that the latest version of the InstateLongdesc Change Prroposal effectively includes mandatory, MUST-level conformance criteria for the conformance class "Visual user agents that support the suggested default rendering".
>
> Note that this section:
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc#Details
>
> Now requires these changes to the Rendering section, which include a number of new "expected" statements:
>
> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/research/ld-rendering2.html
>
> According to the HTML5 spec, implementations meeting the conformance class "Visual user agents that support the suggested default rendering" must implement all "expected" behavior in the Rendering section:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html#conformance-classes

Thank you for finally reading the proposal. This text has been in
place since this task force drafted it and approved it in Spring 2011.
Benjamin expertly authored the bulk of it in response to Steve and
numerous other task force members from the Spring 2011 F2F wanting a
MUST. Benjamin pointed out that a MUST was not the proper way to spec
it and he offered verbiage.

Best Regards,
Laura

-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:55:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 19 September 2012 10:55:39 GMT