W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > March 2012

(unknown charset) Re: Description link consensus

From: (unknown charset) Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 23:15:37 +0100
To: (unknown charset) Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: (unknown charset) HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120322231537521565.8257085d@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Laura Carlson, Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:47:21 -0500:

> But before I commit either way, some questions would need definitive 
> answers:
> 
> * Who will be in the working group that writes HTML.next?

I sent this letter only to the A11Y TF. Because I have consensus within 
the A11Y TF in mind. May be you should ask those in the A11Y TF that 
disagree with you, about whether what I outlined could be something 
they could consent to?

I could be wrong, but I think we will be the most successfull w.r.t. 
@longdesc for <img> if we use energy on ensuring that @longdesc for IMG 
and @aria-describedAT can harmonically co-exist. See the things I 
mentioned in the first letter with suggestions for the describedAT 
draft in that regard. Also, if one thinks that @aria-describedAT and 
@longdesc can co-exist, then one must accept that @aria-describedAT - 
and not @longdesc - is chosen in many cases.
-- 
Leif H Silli
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 22:16:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:05:27 UTC