- From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 10:39:33 +0000
- To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> (janina@rednote.net)" <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael Cooper (cooper@w3.org)" <cooper@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Paul, > Could the TF please confirm how you want bugs 11891 and 11892 processed? In > particular if you think they are part of ISSUE-199, can you please explain > why? The source of the bugs is the WAI-ARIA lexical processing document http://www.w3.org/2011/01/aria-lexical-processing the document states (note:the content in brackets are the associated bugs added for illustrative purposes): HTML ISSUE-129 addresses ARIA integration in HTML 5. The Protocols and Formats Working Group will pursue the following steps to clarify lexical processing of WAI-ARIA in HTML 5 as part of this issue: Provide a definition for the role attribute, since one is not defined by WAI-ARIA. This should be a global attribute. (Bug 11891 - add role attribute to list of global attributes and add definition for it ) Define in Annotations for assistive technology products (ARIA) that the states and properties are formally HTML attributes, in addition to simply providing mapping information. (Bug 11892 - explicitly state that ARIA states and properties are formal/normative HTML attributes) Expand the same section to describe rules for lexical processing of WAI-ARIA attributes. ( Bug 11893 - define lexical processing rules for ARIA attributes) Which is why the bugs are part of issue 199. Is that sufficient explanation? best regards Stevef On 17 January 2012 21:04, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote: > Bug 11893 – “define lexical processing rules for ARIA attributes Bug” was > recently escalated into ISSUE-199. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/199 > > > > This bug indicates that bugs 11891 and 11892 are dependent on bug 11893 but > the Chairs did not include these two additional bugs on the issue status > page description of ISSUE-199 since we are NOT confident that the two > blocked bugs are actually related to the same issue: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-199 > > > > Could the TF please confirm how you want bugs 11891 and 11892 processed? In > particular if you think they are part of ISSUE-199, can you please explain > why? > > > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 10:40:23 UTC