W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Updated ISSUE-206 CP

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:30:59 +0200
To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Cc: John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120822113059880963.fd5d2a08@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis, Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:12:13 +0100:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>> Perhaps Ted and Laura would like to update their proposals with same
>> thing? Namely ask generators to not only add the new attribute but also
>> add the key content mark in the @title?
> 
> Today's AT allows users to configure whether they do or do not want
> images without provided alternate text announced. I don't think we
> should be trying to override user configuration …

3 questions:

1. So do AT in general treat @title and @alt as one and the same thing 
when it comes to that configuration? (To test whether it has any 
impact, one may use this page, which is what I used when writing the 
CP: http://malform.no/testing/html5/img-role-vs-alt/ )

2. What if such an image contains @aria-label?

3. Does it really hurt if they are unable to no disable announcement of 
images that are key content? 
-- 
Leif Halvard Silli
Received on Wednesday, 22 August 2012 09:31:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 22 August 2012 09:31:45 GMT