W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Action item. definition and use of Clean audio in European television

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:49:58 +1000
Message-ID: <BANLkTimperE35FX0BrmJ-t=OjjwVUz3Sug@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Cc: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "HTML Accessibility Task Force (public-html-a11y@w3.org)" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:11 AM, David Singer <singer@apple.com> wrote:
>
> On May 14, 2011, at 19:06 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
>>
>> If we want to have it additionally as a separate track type (@kind), I
>> would almost suggest to just call it "speech", because that's what it
>> is according to the DVB spec: the speech-only provided as separate
>> data with a possibility to increase its gain independently from the
>> other channels.
>
>
> Actually, since the media type of the track already tells us it is audio, I'd prefer just "clean"...

What does "clean" mean to a Web developer or a user? I still think
"speech" is more appropriate and easier to show in a UI. Unless there
are good arguments for "clean".

Silvia.
Received on Friday, 20 May 2011 00:50:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT