W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

Minutes: May 10: HTML Accessibility Bug Triage Sub-Team

From: Martin Kliehm <w3c@kliehm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 18:05:01 +0200
Message-ID: <4DC9622D.5090000@kliehm.com>
To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2011/05/10-a11y-bugs-minutes.html

HTML Accessibility Bug-Triage
10 May 2011

Attendees

Present
     Marco_Ranon, Martin_Kliehm, Michael_Cooper
Regrets
     Laura_Carlson
Chair
     Martin_Kliehm
Scribe
     kliehm


TOPIC: Bugs awaiting a11yTF Keyword Decision

http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Bugs/Bugs_Awaiting_A11yTF_Keyword_Decision

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12283

The HTML Accessibility Task Force Bug Triage sub-team does not consider 
bug #12283 to be TF priority.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12290

Same as above, no TF priority since the bug is a stub.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12306

Adding the a11yTF keyword. The bug triage sub-team thinks we should keep 
an eye on this bug, the current wording of the spec shouldn't be changed.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12325

Bug triage team adding the a11yTF keyword, though the bug is closed and 
shouldn't be re-opened.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12363

The bug-triage sub-team thinks this is an issue of metadata, not of real 
people accessing information, thus we decided not to add the a11yTF keyword.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12405

The bug-triage sub-team doesn't believe it is already possible to have a 
sign language video as alternate track for video, therefore this is not 
TF priority at the moment.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12526

Although this bug is fixed, the bug-triage sub-team adds the a11yTF 
keyword because of it's importance in case it gets re-opened in the 
course of another text change.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12562

The bug-triage sub-team does not condsider this bug to be TF priority.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12587

Bug-triage sub-team adding the a11yTF keyword because this issue is 
already discussed in the TF and related to ongoing work regarding @alt 
validation.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12590

Same as above.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12591

dito

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12604

The provision of a change proposal is priority for the TF, therefore 
adding the a11yTF keyword.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10493

The bug triage sub-team doesn't think this bug is TF priority anymore 
because the related issue has been closed.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11447

Bug triage sub-team does not consider this to be task force priority 
because it's not a bug filed against the spec, nevertheless we hope it 
will be dealt with sufficiently.
Received on Tuesday, 10 May 2011 16:06:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT