W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Moving longdesc forward: Recap, updates, consensus

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 03:21:33 +0200
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>
Message-ID: <20110506032133135998.e11b202e@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Laura Carlson, Thu, 5 May 2011 12:09:33 -0500:

> I have updated the 10.6.1 User Agent rendering draft trying to
> incorporate Chaals suggestion to add info on real world
> implementations and Leif's suggestion to add info on iCab's
> contextual-menu cursor. Is it okay?

Yes, I guess "_special_ contextual-menu" is precise enough. (Because it 
doesn't use Webkit's "native" contextual-menu cursor.)

 ....
> CHANGE PROPOSAL
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/InstateLongdesc
> 
> No one has offered concrete suggestions to improve the change proposal
> in the "Moving longdesc forward" thread. Does anyone have any?

Spec text is part of the CP, no? ;-)

> I am particularly wondering about the Change Proposal's Implementation
> section [3]. I think we have good evidence in that section but  how
> can it be presented to make a more compelling case? For instance,
> would it be good to add a link to the User Agent longdesc rendering
> info [4] or not?

That sounds like a good idea. (I must look more on this.)
... 
-- 
Leif H Silli
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 01:22:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT