W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Moving longdesc forward: Recap, updates, consensus

From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 17:36:34 -0700 (PDT)
To: "'Leif Halvard Silli'" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Sam Ruby'" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, "'Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis'" <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>, "'Geoff Freed'" <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, "'Richard Schwerdtfeger'" <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "'Steve Faulkner'" <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>, "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <oedipus@hicom.net>
Message-ID: <014201cc0b85$a6c18cc0$f444a640$@edu>
Leif Halvard Silli [mailto:xn--mlform-iua@målform.no] wrote:
>
> I'm not sure that it is critical to have then on-page. May be a subpage
> with all the use cases, and a direct link to each use case from the
> front page? That is mention them from front page, but keep the actual
> description on the subpage?
>
> Main thing, from my point of view, is that a) the front page can be
> read as meaningful in itself and b) that it is clear that the subpages
> are also part of the CP.

+1

JF
Received on Friday, 6 May 2011 00:37:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT