W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > May 2011

Re: Moving longdesc forward

From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 07:49:58 +0100
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=pDkzGObiTLCVOrUHAX9UP_oGnzw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
<xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
> If authors want to send plain text then they should instead use ARIA.
> For example, this works fine in VoiceOver:
>
> <img alt=Blah src=image aria-labelledby="script">
> <script type="text/plain" id="script">Lorem Ipsum.</script>
>
> This is much better than a separate plain/text docuemnt, as the
> encoding is then taken care of.

One of the requirements the TF adopted was that authors need to be point to
external long text alternatives. Although I don't buy this requirement, it
does not make sense to say this is required only if the long text alternative
has a structure that can be expressed with markup.

I don't buy the character encoding problem for text/plain, which seems soluble
with out-of-band metadata like content-type (as you note) or sniffing.

> Really, it disappoints me very much if we cannot agree that @longdesc
> should point to HTML documents. Then we are promoting an unclear
> picture of what  @longdesc is for.

We don't appear to have consensus about what @longdesc is for.

--
Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Thursday, 5 May 2011 06:50:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:38 GMT