- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 15:37:36 +0200
- To: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Leif Halvard Silli, Wed, 4 May 2011 15:36:22 +0200: > Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis, Wed, 4 May 2011 14:17:07 +0100: >> On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Leif Halvard Silli: >>> May be a list of acceptable formats should be given rather than >>> 'structured host language content'. >> >> What list? > > http://www.w3.org/mid/20110504144508806890.f1e4453a@xn--mlform-iua.no And: http://www.w3.org/mid/20110504152204634608.a973ed8c@xn--mlform-iua.no >>>> Note that if we impose such a constraint we will render some existing >>>> longdesc use non-conforming. Three of Laura's examples of @longdesc >>>> in the wild use plain text for long descriptions. >>>> >>>> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/research/ld.html#fakoo >>>> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/research/ld.html#securian >>>> http://www.d.umn.edu/~lcarlson/research/ld.html#buffalo >>> >>> HTML5 is not about blessing existing content. >> >> I didn't say it was. Do we have any reason to say the above should be >> non-conforming though? Is it inaccessible? > > http://www.w3.org/mid/20110504144508806890.f1e4453a@xn--mlform-iua.no And: http://www.w3.org/mid/20110504152204634608.a973ed8c@xn--mlform-iua.no -- leif h silli
Received on Wednesday, 4 May 2011 13:38:03 UTC