W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > March 2010

Re: resolution supporting navsubstree change proposal

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:29:07 +1100
Message-ID: <2c0e02831003160629rd74c135wfdd12780da134de1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
Excellent - looking forward to it! Sorry I misread.
Regards,
Silvia.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Steven Faulkner
<faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi sylvia,
> as i said in my reply to maciej a few hours ago, and also in the last a11y
> taskforce meeting, i will write the change proposal.
>
> regards
> stevef
>
> On 16 March 2010 10:57, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> During last Thursday's a11y task-force telcon, we made the
>> >>> following resolution and agreed to announce it on this mailing
>> >>> list and to give an opportunity to any members of the task force
>> >>> who not on the telcon to express any disagreements they might have
>> >>> with the resolution.
>> >>>
>> >>> RESOLUTION: The a11y TF resolves that the canvas navsubtree
>> >>> proposal is ready for wider review by the HTML WG, with the
>> >>> understanding that the a11y TF supports it and that related
>> >>> proposals needed to fully resolve the issue are still under
>> >>> discussion and will be brought to the HTML WG later.
>> >>>
>> >>> If you have any comments on that resolution, please send them by
>> >>> e-mail to this list prior to the a11y task-force telcon this
>> >>> Thursday.
>> >>
>> >> I'd still like an answer to my question about the earlier version of
>> >> this
>> >> proposal (where it was called "adom"):
>> >>
>> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Feb/0507.html
>> >>
>> >> I asked this on Feb 23, and I never got a response, nor do I recall
>> >> this
>> >> question being answered in the course of the discussions at that time.
>> >
>> > Looking back at the thread, I also don't see where Ian, Silvia or
>> > Tantek's
>> > concerns were addressed, but I guess they can speak for themselves.
>> >
>> > I also do not know where to find a link to the Change Proposal. The only
>> > link I can find is this, which is not a proper Change Proposal (among
>> > other
>> > things it lacks rationale):
>> >
>> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Mar/att-0014/canvaselement-issue74-feedback1.html>.
>> > Is there a version available that includes rationale? Perhaps that would
>> > answer my question.
>>
>> Since Maciej is digging it out again - of all the things that I asked
>> and didn't get an answer for, I would also say that the most important
>> is to have a proper change proposal. It is impossible to evaluate what
>> the changes mean and what implications they have without such a
>> proposal. Such a change proposal might even answer all the questions
>> that I still have. In fact, I don't think the TF should allow any
>> proposals to be handed on to the HTML WG without a proper written
>> change proposal.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Silvia.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG Europe
> Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
> Web Accessibility Toolbar -
> http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:30:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:03 GMT