W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > March 2010

Re: resolution supporting navsubstree change proposal

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:24:25 +0000
Message-ID: <55687cf81003160624n6cd5e660g8d9b9a147a719307@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
hi sylvia,
as i said in my reply to maciej a few hours ago, and also in the last a11y
taskforce meeting, i will write the change proposal.

regards
stevef

On 16 March 2010 10:57, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

>  On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote:
> >>
> >>> During last Thursday's a11y task-force telcon, we made the
> >>> following resolution and agreed to announce it on this mailing
> >>> list and to give an opportunity to any members of the task force
> >>> who not on the telcon to express any disagreements they might have
> >>> with the resolution.
> >>>
> >>> RESOLUTION: The a11y TF resolves that the canvas navsubtree
> >>> proposal is ready for wider review by the HTML WG, with the
> >>> understanding that the a11y TF supports it and that related
> >>> proposals needed to fully resolve the issue are still under
> >>> discussion and will be brought to the HTML WG later.
> >>>
> >>> If you have any comments on that resolution, please send them by
> >>> e-mail to this list prior to the a11y task-force telcon this
> >>> Thursday.
> >>
> >> I'd still like an answer to my question about the earlier version of
> this
> >> proposal (where it was called "adom"):
> >>
> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Feb/0507.html
> >>
> >> I asked this on Feb 23, and I never got a response, nor do I recall this
> >> question being answered in the course of the discussions at that time.
> >
> > Looking back at the thread, I also don't see where Ian, Silvia or
> Tantek's
> > concerns were addressed, but I guess they can speak for themselves.
> >
> > I also do not know where to find a link to the Change Proposal. The only
> > link I can find is this, which is not a proper Change Proposal (among
> other
> > things it lacks rationale):
> > <
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Mar/att-0014/canvaselement-issue74-feedback1.html
> >.
> > Is there a version available that includes rationale? Perhaps that would
> > answer my question.
>
> Since Maciej is digging it out again - of all the things that I asked
> and didn't get an answer for, I would also say that the most important
> is to have a proper change proposal. It is impossible to evaluate what
> the changes mean and what implications they have without such a
> proposal. Such a change proposal might even answer all the questions
> that I still have. In fact, I don't think the TF should allow any
> proposals to be handed on to the HTML WG without a proper written
> change proposal.
>
> Best Regards,
> Silvia.
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:25:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 04:42:03 GMT