Re: Working Group Decision on ISSUE-91: Removing the aside Element

Hi Shelley and John,

I wrote:

>> But the chairs didn't address or discuss points Shelley
>> raised in her change proposals. If the chairs could do that, it might
>> avoid a formal objection. I don't know.

John wrote:

> I don't think that at this point in the process that would be their
> responsibility.

You are absolutely right by letter of the policy. Spirit is another
story. I was hoping that misunderstandings might be rectified. But
sometimes I hope too much.

Shelley wrote:

> I think Laura was trying to facilitate communication, perhaps hoping to
> avoid the filing of several FOs, which is not something any of us
> wanted. Let me know if I'm offbase on that one, Laura.

That is correct, Shelley. But it seems that the attempt was too
little;  too late. Sorry.

> I appreciate her effort, but I believe that Sam has shut down the
> discussion, which is a co-chair prerogative. I'm waiting resolution on
> several change proposals before I determine my next steps.

Okay.

Best Regards,
Laura
--
Laura L. Carlson

Received on Friday, 4 June 2010 23:17:03 UTC