W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

POWDER + GRDDL = POWDER semantics?

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:13:57 +0000
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>, "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
CC: Phil Archer <parcher@icra.org>
Message-ID: <184112FE564ADF4F8F9C3FA01AE50009DED0D437DC@G1W0486.americas.hpqcorp.net>

Just to elaborate a little more on POWDER semantics, my hope is that the GRDDL results would provide the authoritative semantics of a POWDER document, i.e., that there would not be two separate and possibly conflicting specifications of the semantics of a POWDER document (one for POWDER Lite and another for POWDER Full).  Is that correct?

David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 18:14:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:12 UTC