W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > January 2008

RE: on test #grddlonrdf

From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:48:17 +0000
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
CC: "public-grddl-wg@w3.org" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <184112FE564ADF4F8F9C3FA01AE50009DED0A411A0@G1W0486.americas.hpqcorp.net>

> From: Jeremy Carroll [mailto:jjc@hpl.hp.com]
> [ . . . ]
> I think what would be consistent with our earlier decisions
> would be to
> make the test informative, on the basis that it shows plausible
> implementation behaviour in the face of (slightly) ill-formed input,
> which the spec does not cover. An implementation that refused to fire
> #rule_rdfxbase would, at a formal level, be correct.

An erratum to that effect sounds fine to me.



David Booth, Ph.D.
HP Software
+1 617 629 8881 office  |  dbooth@hp.com
http://www.hp.com/go/software

Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Friday, 25 January 2008 18:49:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:12 UTC