See also: IRC log
RESOLVED: to approve GRDDL WG Weekly -- 14 March 2007 as a true record http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/att-0110/14-grddl-wg-minutes.html
RESOLVED: to meet again Wed, 28 March 11:00-0500. Scribe will be JJC
<HarryH> ACTION: [DONE] HarryH contact AC Reps directly about form if not filled out by next Tuesday. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action01]
<HarryH> Rachael Yaeger, Ben Adida, and Samsung.
harry: can we contact them by phone?
DanC: yes, I'll give you a pointer to the directory.
<HarryH> BrianS? Feedback from microformat land on GRDDL?
Harry: can we get more involvement from microformat comunnity?
DanC: one possibility is to have GRDDL on the XTech site http://2007.xtech.org/
<chimezie> btw: Ed Dumhill did update the XTech schedule with the profiles
<chimezie> it's just not valid XML =) (missing entity references)
Chime: the Xtech page has a GRDDL profile but the missing entity references prevent me from parsing the site.
jjc: isn't what we need sexy applications doing something GRDDL can do and microformats alone can't do?
<DanC> yeah... profile in the hCard creator... how about that, briansuda ?
<briansuda> those are the code generators http://microformats.org/code/?page_id=20
<briansuda> i can email him
<HarryH> BrianS, cc me.
<Simone> I Like a GRDDL-o-matic
<HarryH> Wordpress/Yahoo would be great if they used profile URIs
<HarryH> ACTION: BrianS to contact RyanKing about adding GRDDL profile for hCal/hCard to Javascripot microformat generator. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action02]
<HarryH> Ack - also add hReview.
Murray: add microformat to W3C documents?
DanC: I try to do it when I can (e.g. last W3C tech plenary)
<DanC> volunteer to write to email@example.com regarding http://www.w3.org/Consortium/contact ?
ACTION: BrianS to add microformats+GRDDL Profile to http://www.w3.org/Consortium/contact and contact w3c. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action03]
<chimezie> Semantic Tech Conference?
<DanC> ooh... good idea, chimezie
Murray: what about WWW2007?
Harry: does anyone want to do the Calendar of WWW07?
ACTION: HarryH to contact WWW2007 over microformats+GRDDL for their calendar. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action04]
ACTION: Chime to get Semantic Tech 2007 to use GRDDL+microformats for their calendar. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action05]
<briansuda> another hCalendar-o-matic for quick conference schedule creation http://dmitry.baranovskiy.com/work/csc/
<DanC> I see http://www.semantic-conference.com/ ... with images for the date/place: May 20-24 San Jose
Harry: all of our previous examples use SPARQL and RDF
Harry: there is a request to use OWL examples
<chimezie> OWL entailment example for the HL7 scenario: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007Mar/0126.html
ACTION: JJC, to review the primer. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action06]
JJC: publishing as a note does not preclude us from publishing again after
RESOLVED: Publish Use-Case document as W3C Note. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm
<DanC> so please s/This document is a Working Group Note/This document is [not yet] a Working Group Note/
<DanC> maybe http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=wg-note-tr ....
ACTION: FabienG to request W3C Webmaster to publish Use-Case document as W3C Note with any additional status text added. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action07]
<DanC> I see 1.3 2007/03/19 13:24:45 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests.html
Chime: putting it together for
publication and DanC and JJC comments addressed.
...: the current test repository should have life time behond the lifetime of WG
JJC: anything going in a ZIP is
ok, first working draft I d'ont care
...: the editor should have adequate discretion on test naming conventions
DanC: only Harry can send a transition request.
Harry: just ping me when it's ready.
<DanC> 1st public WD process: http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=fpwd-wd-tr
<DanC> try: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/grddl-tests.html,pubrules
JJC: the 404 is not allowed unless it's an example.
ACTION: jjc to produce htaccess file for test-case [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action08]
JJC: getting the first working draft out really is the main issue.
DanC: has anybody tried to make a table of results?
ACTION: HarryH to run EARL-> HTML table generator [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action09]
DanC: none of these actions are in the critical path.
ACTION: jjc to produce EARL for his implementation, and then sort out multiple test passing in his EARL. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action10]
Harry: what about the null case ?
<DanC> (currently there's no SPARQL in testft.py nor the earl->html thingy. jjc, if you want to introduce SPARQL, it might be most straightforward to switch from python to java altogether)
ACTION [DONE]: Chime adding sentence to Test Case Doc specifying that local security policy must be set to none before running tests
Chime: your policy should not prevent you from running the case.
<HarryH> PROPOSAL: To publish test-case document as Working Draft? - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc50/grddl-tests.html
<chimezie> Revision 1.7
<DanC> I'm happy to go with 1.7 + any edits agreed by chime+jjc
JJC: the publication as a test case does not include the tests except in the ZIP
ACTION: Chime to fix the relative URL problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action11]
RESOLVED: To publish test-case document as Working Draft? - http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc50/grddl-tests.html once relative URIs are fixed
<Zakim> DanC, you wanted to ask about .xsl on the end of the transform uris
JJC: subProfile and glean mechanisms removed
ACTION: jjc to edit library file to remove .xsls [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action13]
ACTION: jjc to get write access to library directory [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/03/21-grddl-wg-minutes.html#action14]
<HarryH> go to item 7
<DanC> a test: http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/td/testlist3#grddlonrdf1
<DanC> JJC: the SHOULD in the spec only supports result 3, the merge
<HarryH> What SHOULD exactly?
<DanC> DanC: "An implementation only has to produce one of these three" connotes MUST, where the spec says SHOULD
JJC: get the doc out and then review the wording
<HarryH> I wrote that, am happy for "has to produce" to be changed to "should produce"