Re: review of use cases

Jeremy,

Thank you for your review ; I integrated it in v 1.81 2007/03/19 16:54:56
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/grddl-wg/doc43/scenario-gallery.htm


All,

The document is now ready for a WG Note and I think we should include a 
vote on this in the agenda of the next telecon.

cheers,



Jeremy Carroll:
> 1) delete number 1 on Introduction header.
Done.

> 2) In introduction, excerpt entitled RDF/XML
> Suggest replace:
>      <dc:subject>ADAM; Simple Search; Index+;
> prototype</dc:subject>
>
> with
>
>      <dc:subject
> >ADAM; Simple Search; Index+; prototype</dc:subject>
>
> to avoid line breaking in the string.
> (looks worse though, I am happy for the editor to ignore this).
Done.

> HTTP header
> ===========
> [[
> This use-case uses a feature that is not, and will not be, included in 
> the GRDDL Working Draft. It should be addressable in the future using 
> the mechanims described in the HTTP Header Linking Draft once that is 
> accepted by the IETF as an RFC.
> ]]
Done.

> would need to be changed to
> [[
> Using the ability of HTTP Header Linking Draft to specify Link and 
> Profiles for GRDDL transformation in HTTP Headers, Oceanic Consortium 
> can serve RDF via GRDDL without altering their XML documents.
> ]]
Done.

> - changes to conform to WG Note style
Changed CSS and added <h2>W3C Working Group Note 19 March 2007</h2>

> - change to SOTD, for example, as follows, which simplifies the 
> previous SOTD. 
Done.

> PS This document was of a significantly higher quality than I expected.
Thank you.

-- 
Fabien - http://www.inria.fr/acacia/fabien/

Received on Monday, 19 March 2007 17:03:18 UTC