- From: Booth, David (HP Software - Boston) <dbooth@hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 17:46:27 -0400
- To: "GRDDL Working Group" <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: <ogbujic@ccf.org>, "Clark, John" <CLARKJ2@ccf.org>
To satisfactorily address all of issue-dbooth-3 except the absence of a definition of "complete GRDDL results", John Clark, Chimezie Ogbuji and David Booth propose the following normative change. Of course corresponding changes to the non-normative text would also be needed, and David is willing to do or help with those as the WG desires. In http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#rule_result [[ If an information resource([WEBARCH], section 2.2) IR is represented by an XML document with an XPath root node R, and R has a GRDDL transformation with a transformation property TP, and TP applied to R gives an RDF Graph[RDFC04] G, then G is a GRDDL result of IR. ]] change: "XML document" to "XML document D" and: "TP applied to R" to "TP applied to D" Observations: - This change would permit the GRDDL transformation to control *all* XML document processing, thus permitting the transformation author to be unambiguous (if desired) about the RDF graph that is intended. - It is simple change for GRDDL implementations. - It would not require any test case changes. - It does not require re-opening faithful-infoset. - It would still enable transformation authors to use XProc if desired when XProc is finished. David Booth, Ph.D. HP Software +1 617 629 8881 office | dbooth@hp.com http://www.hp.com/go/software Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not represent the official views of HP unless explicitly stated otherwise.
Received on Monday, 18 June 2007 21:47:22 UTC