W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > December 2007


From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:33:36 +0000
Message-ID: <4766A4E0.4090901@hpl.hp.com>
To: public-grddl-wg@w3.org


I have been thinking about POWDER.
I have a meeting tomorrow with a few people to discuss it.

My prework is on www-archive (all in December)

I would value any feedback from people in this WG whether the suggested 
use of GRDDL on POWDER docs (which are in RDF/XML) as sketched in


is appropriate or not.

Basically, I try and arrange a document to have a weakish RDF semantics 
when read as RDF/XML, and then strengthen the semantics, closer to the 
intended operational meaning, using a GRDDL transform. The motivation is 
to hide some of the complexity of OWL needed to express the intended 
formal meaning.

At some level it feels too clever by half.

Link into index

Received on Monday, 17 December 2007 16:34:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:12 UTC