Re: New W3C GRDDL service

Dom,

    Thanks so much! The service looks excellent - I'm impressed! I'd
like to include a link to this in our W3C Press Release.  Is this
officially W3C-supported and can we can announce it our press release?

    I guess the other two missing pieces of the puzzle would be if the
new HTML validator noticed GRDDL mark-up in input and put up a link to
the GRDDL service and if one gave a GRDDL-enabled HTML or XML data to
the RDF validator if it instead redirected to the GRDDL service. What
does everyone think?

         
Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As was discussed on this list before, and in replacement to the existing
> XSLT-based GRDDL demonstrators, I have set up a new W3C GRDDL service
> at:
> http://www.w3.org/2007/08/grddl/
> (see also the announcement on my blog [1])
>
> It is based on Redland, and so should be pretty close to full
> conformance to GRDDL, although I haven't made it run through the test
> suite - I've been informed of at least one bug that should be fixed in
> an upcoming release of python-librdf, but I think the current service is
> already a vast improvement over the previous services.
>
> It also has an optional Turtle output.
>
> Dom
>
> 1. http://people.w3.org/~dom/archives/2007/08/new-w3c-grddl-service/
>
>
>
>
>   


-- 
		-harry

Harry Halpin,  University of Edinburgh 
http://www.ibiblio.org/hhalpin 6B522426