W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: review of spec

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:21:21 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1177507281.9528.383.camel@dirk>

On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 11:28 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec
>   $Date: 2007/04/24 05:22:45 $
> 
> Other than the three issues highlighted by the editor:
>    - normative ref, or not, to the test cases
>    - cite html base or not
>    - allow invalid xhtml or not
>    - stylesheet issue
> 
> I see no critical issues preventing publication of this draft as a CR.
> 
> I suggest two minor editorial changes:
> 
> a) In SOTD delete:
> [[
> An extract of normative material only has been put on hold for the next 
> release. It may be resumed for future releases.
> ]]

I don't include that bit when it goes out on /TR/; that's only
status of the editor's draft.

> rationale: I no longer think we will do this. If this is still plausible 
> I am happy to see the potential promise as still there.
> 
> b) In the new text concerning RDF/XML, add an article:
> i.e.
> old
> [[
> For the purposes of the rule above, root element whose local name is RDF
> ]]
> suggested new
> [[
> For the purposes of the rule above, a root element whose local name is RDF
> ]]

Good catch.

For the sake of stability for the 24-hour-window before today's telcon,
I'm not going to commit that edit just yet. Please help me remember.

> Jeremy
> 
> 
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 13:21:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:49 GMT