- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:21:21 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 11:28 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec > $Date: 2007/04/24 05:22:45 $ > > Other than the three issues highlighted by the editor: > - normative ref, or not, to the test cases > - cite html base or not > - allow invalid xhtml or not > - stylesheet issue > > I see no critical issues preventing publication of this draft as a CR. > > I suggest two minor editorial changes: > > a) In SOTD delete: > [[ > An extract of normative material only has been put on hold for the next > release. It may be resumed for future releases. > ]] I don't include that bit when it goes out on /TR/; that's only status of the editor's draft. > rationale: I no longer think we will do this. If this is still plausible > I am happy to see the potential promise as still there. > > b) In the new text concerning RDF/XML, add an article: > i.e. > old > [[ > For the purposes of the rule above, root element whose local name is RDF > ]] > suggested new > [[ > For the purposes of the rule above, a root element whose local name is RDF > ]] Good catch. For the sake of stability for the 24-hour-window before today's telcon, I'm not going to commit that edit just yet. Please help me remember. > Jeremy > > -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2007 13:21:23 UTC