W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: possible text on validation

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:52:01 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1175827921.19929.99.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:32 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> Second attempt:
> Hmmmm,
> I think that's better than the earlier essay!

yes, much.

done in http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#txforms 1.247

Document authors, particularly XHTML document authors, who wish their
documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL should avoid
dependencies on an external DTD subset (see section 2.8 of [XML]);

      * Explicitly include the XHTML namespace declaration in an XHTML
        document, or an appropriate namespace in an XML document.
      * Avoid use of entity references, except those listed in section
        4.6 of [XML]
      * And, more generally, follow the rules listed for the standalone
        document validity constraint.

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 04:52:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:11 UTC