W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > April 2007

Re: possible text on validation

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 21:52:01 -0500
To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1175827921.19929.99.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:32 +0100, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
> 
> Second attempt:
[...]
> Hmmmm,
> I think that's better than the earlier essay!

yes, much.

done in http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec#txforms 1.247

[[
Document authors, particularly XHTML document authors, who wish their
documents to be unambiguous when used with GRDDL should avoid
dependencies on an external DTD subset (see section 2.8 of [XML]);
specifically:

      * Explicitly include the XHTML namespace declaration in an XHTML
        document, or an appropriate namespace in an XML document.
      * Avoid use of entity references, except those listed in section
        4.6 of [XML]
      * And, more generally, follow the rules listed for the standalone
        document validity constraint.
]]


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 6 April 2007 04:52:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:48 GMT