W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: RDF namespace document example in spec or primer or both? [was: spec#issue-...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:14:12 -0500
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161364453.4237.233.camel@dirk>

On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 11:17 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote:
> I am not so sure that it needs to move. I would like to hear from the
> masses.

> At 03:13 PM 10/20/2006 +0100, Ian Davis wrote:
[...]
> > I agree it should be in the primer but I won't have time to do that
> > before the target spec pub date. I also don't want to be on the
> > critical path. Can you alter the text to say something more direct
> > such as "This section will be moved to the primer in the next
> > version"?

Thanks for the advice.

I moved the editorial note to the end of the subsection,
and made another one just like it at the end of the
next subsection.

"The Working Group is likely to add a section to the GRDDL primer much
like this subsection. Since this subsection has no novel normative
material, we're interested in feedback on whether it should remain part
of this specification once it is covered by the primer."
 -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec 1.124

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 17:14:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT