W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

RDF namespace document example in spec or primer or both? [was: spec#issue-...]

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:55:17 -0500
To: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161352517.4237.162.camel@dirk>

On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:51 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
[...]
> Additional observations for current spec draft:
> 
> I would move 'Using GRDDL with an RDF Namespace document' to the primer as 
> suggested.

Ah... that's feedback on _this_ round of publication.

I'd like to hear from one or two other WG members before I make
up my mind on this. Any opinions? Maybe keep it for now and
strike it after Ian has a chance to work it into the primer?

[[
Using GRDDL with an RDF Namespace document

Move this section to the primer? It has no novel normative material.
]]
 -- http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 13:55:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT