W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: RDF namespace document example in spec or primer or both? [was: spec#issue-...]

From: Ian Davis <ian.davis@talis.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 15:13:10 +0100
Message-ID: <4538D976.40207@talis.com>
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
CC: Chimezie Ogbuji <ogbujic@bio.ri.ccf.org>, GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>

On 20/10/2006 14:55, Dan Connolly wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 22:51 -0400, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> [...]
>> Additional observations for current spec draft:
>>
>> I would move 'Using GRDDL with an RDF Namespace document' to the primer as 
>> suggested.
> 
> Ah... that's feedback on _this_ round of publication.
> 
> I'd like to hear from one or two other WG members before I make
> up my mind on this. Any opinions? Maybe keep it for now and
> strike it after Ian has a chance to work it into the primer?

I agree it should be in the primer but I won't have time to do that 
before the target spec pub date. I also don't want to be on the critical 
path. Can you alter the text to say something more direct such as "This 
section will be moved to the primer in the next version"?

Ian
-- 
http://purl.org/NET/iand
Blogging at... http://iandavis.com/blog
Working on... http://directory.talis.com/
Received on Friday, 20 October 2006 14:13:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT