W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-grddl-wg@w3.org > October 2006

Re: section 2. Adding GRDDL to well-formed XML for review

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:41:04 -0500
To: Murray Maloney <murray@muzmo.com>
Cc: GRDDL Working Group <public-grddl-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1161110464.4240.23.camel@dirk>

On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 12:50 -0400, Murray Maloney wrote:
> Dan,
> 
> I know that I said that you should feel free to edit my words, but...
> 
> At the beginning of section 2, the sentence starts
> 
> "The general form of associating an RDF graph with a well-formed XML
> document ..."
> 
> Wheras I wrote:
> 
> "The general form of adding a GRDDL assertion to a well-formed XML
> document ..."
> 
> I find your wording misleading, even though it may be accurate.

Hmm... what direction does it mislead?

"GRDDL assertion" is likely to get confused with "RDF statement"
so I'm not happy with that.

> Just my opinion.
> 
> Murray
-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 17 October 2006 18:41:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:11:46 GMT